Contents - Previous - Next


This is the old United Nations University website. Visit the new site at http://unu.edu


1. Crop residue mulch

Crop residues contain substantial quantities of plant nutrients. The data in Table 31 show the nutrient composition of the crop residues of some crops grown in the humid tropics. The concentration in oven-dry tissue ranges from 0.58% to 4.0% for N. 0.1% to 1.1% for P. and 0.2% to 3.4% for K. Nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations are generally higher in legumes than in cereals. On a weight basis, the major plant nutrients contained in 1 Mg of crop residue may range from 15 to 60 kg of N. P. and K (Table 32).

The beneficial effects of returning crop residue as mulch on crop yield are well known. These benefits are due not only to the recycling of plant nutrients but also to improvements in soil moisture and temperature regimes, enhancement of soil structure, and erosion control. However, the use of crop residues as fertilizers is especially important to resource-poor farmers. Some examples of the beneficial effects of crop residue mulch on crop yields are shown by the data in Tables 33 through 37. The data in Table 33 show that compared with an unmatched control, crop yields were improved with any mulch material. Rice husks increased maize yield by 0.7 Mg/ha and cassava yield by 12 Mg/ha. The data in Table 34 on yam production on an acid soil in eastern Nigeria show that mulching significantly increased the yam tuber yield. Mulching increased tuber yield by 20% on both ridge till and flat seedbed.

Table 31 Nutrient composition of crop residues of some crops grown in the humid tropics

(kg/ha/yr)

Crop/species

N

P

K

C/N ratio

Cowpea stem 1.07 1.14 2.54 -
Cowpea leaves 1.99 0.19 2.20 -
Rice 0.58 0.10 1.38 105.0
Maize 0.59 0.31 1.31 55.0
Oil palm (processed fibre) 1.24 0.10 0.36 -
Sesbania leaves 4.0 0.19 2.0 -
Crotolaria spp. 2.89 0.29 0.72 -
Tephrosia spp. 3.73 0.28 1.78 -
Water hyacinth 2.04 0.37 3.40 18.0
Azolla spp. 3.68 0.20 0. 15 -
Typha spp. 1.37 0.21 2.38 -

(Modified from FAO, 1990)

Returning crop residue as mulch may also have synergistic effects with fertilizer use. The data from the eastern Amazon by Schoningh and Alkamper (1984) showed that crop residue mulches with low C:N ratios had more beneficial effects than those with high C:N ratios (Table 35). On an Ultisol in eastern Nigeria (Tables 36 and 37), the yield of plantain and bananas was drastically improved by residue mulch.

Table 32 Plant nutrients contained in 1 Mg of dry straw

(kg/Mg)

Crop/species

N

P

K

Total

Cowpea stem 10.7 11.4 25.4 47.5
Cowpea leaves 19.9 1.9 22.0 43.8
Rice 5.8 1.0 1 3.8 20.6
Maize 5.9 3.1 13.1 22.1
Oil palm (fibre) 12.4 1.0 3.6 17.0
Sesbania leaves 40.0 1.9 20.0 61.9
Crotolaria spp. 28.9 2.9 7.2 39.0
Tephrosia spp. 37.3 2.8 17.8 57.9
Water hyacinth 20.4 3.7 34.0 58.1
Azolla spp. 36.8 2.0 1.5 40.3
Typha.spp 13.7 2.1 23.8 39 6

(Recalculated from the data in Table 31)

Plantain yield was five times more with mulch than with chemical fertilizers alone. The data in Fig. 18 show that returning crop residue mulch enhanced the beneficial effects of fertilizer application in maize yield (Kang, 1993). Without fertilizer application, residue retention had little effect on maize grain yield.

Table 33 Crop yield response to 22 different mulch materials applied on Alfisols in Nigeria

(Mg/ha)

Mulch

Cassava (fresh roots)

Maize

Cowpea

Soybean

Bare soil (control) 16.4 def 3.0 e 0.6 a 0.6 de
Maize stover 16.4 def 3.3 cd 1.1 a 1.5 abc
Maize cobs 17.8; cdef 3.3 cd 1.1 a 1.4 abed
Oil palm leaves 17.1 def 3.2 cd 1.2 a 0.9 bcde
Rice straw 17.9 cdef 3.5 bed 1.0 a 1.5 abc
Rice husks 28.3 a 3.7 abc 1.1 a 0.8 de
Kikuyu grass straw 14.2 ef 3.3 cd 1.2 a 1.4 abed
Elephant/napier grass (Pennisetum) 16.6 def 3.3 ed 0.9 a 1.3 bed
Guinea grass 15.5 f 3.6 bed 2.1 b 1.5 ab
Andropogon straw 18.5 cdef 3.5 bed 1.0 a 1.2 bcde
Cattail straw (Typha) 16.7 def 3.1 cd 1.0 a 1.1 bcde
Cassava stem (chipped) 20.9 cd 3.8 abc 0.9 a 1.4 abcd
Pigeon pea tops 22.9 be 3.7 abc 1.1 a 0.9 cde
Pigeon pea stem (chipped) 19.9 café 3.5 bed 1.0 a 1.3 bcd
Legume husks 26.4 ab 4.4 a 1.0 a 1.5 abc
Soybean tops 22.9 be 4.2 ab 1.0 a 1.2 bcde
Hemp (Eupatroium) 18.8 cdef 3.6 abc 1.0 a 1.2 bcde
Mixed twigs (chipped) 18.5 cdef 3.4 bed 1.0 a 1.2 bcde
Sawdust 20.5 cde 3.7 abc 0.9 a 1.9 a
Black plastic 30.5 ab 3.0 cd 0.9a 1.1 bcde
Transluscent plastic 27.7 ab 2.7 d 1.0 a 1.1 bcde
Fine gravel 22.9 be 3.1 cd 1.0 a 1.0 bcde

Figures followed by similar Ietters are stastically similar within vertical roust (Okigbo and Lal. 1980)

Table 34 Effects of tillage methods and mulching on yield and yield components of yam tubers in eastern Nigeria

Treatment

Diameter (cm)

Length (cm)

Number

Mean tuber yield (Mg/ha)

Ridge, mulch 16.7 a 23.5 b 9936 b 15.4 a
Flat, mulch 17.1 a 21.7a 12916a 16.1 a
Ridge, no mulch 13.3 b 20.7 a 10385 b 12.8 b
Flat, no mulch 13.8 b 20.6 a 10128 b 13.4 b

Figures followed by similar letters are statistically similar within vertical rows.

(Maduakor et al., 1984}

Table 35 Yield response of maize and cowpea to different mulch materials and mineral fertilizer in an eastern Amazon Oxisol, Capitao Poco (CPATU) Para, Brazil, 1983

(kg/Mg)

Mulches used (10 Mg/ha of dm)

First crop (maize)*

Second crop (cowpea)**

 

NPK (kg/ha) 20-80-60

NPK 0-0-0

NPK 30-80-60

NPK 0-0-0

Elephant grass 4646 2144 1227 80
Pueraria 5697 3342 1187 114
Weeds 4911 2215 1394 105
Sec. Forest (2 3 years) 4462 1560 1191 35
Sec. Forest (4 5 years) 4479 1807 1397 95
Rice husks 4398 1146 1487 163
Maize cobs + husks 4863 2101 1302 41
Bare soil 3539 78 1169 7
LSD. 5% 987 281
LSD. 1% 1321 376
LSD. 0.1% 1729 493

* Grain moisture content 14. 5%
** Grain moisture content 13, %

(Schoningh and Alkamper 1984)


Contents - Previous - Next