Accounting for prepregnancy
BMI and for the revised recommended gestational weight gains may
increase substantially estimates of the additional protein needed
during pregnancy. An adequate evaluation of this possibility
requires that pregnancy outcomes, gestational weight gains, and
maternal BMI be examined in other than US populations.
Furthermore, the data base which describes the composition of
weight gain during pregnancy for groups of women representative
of a wide range of prepregnancy BMI should be improved, and more
detailed attention should be given to the efficiency of N
utilization during pregnancy.
3.1. Influence of gestational weight gains on energy needs
3.2. Physical activity and pregnancy
3.3. Summary of energy requirements during pregnancy
Energy demands of pregnancy
usually are estimated at approximately 77000 kcal (HYTTEN and
LEITCH, 1971). Although variations in activity levels account for
major differences in the energy needs of individuals, most
estimates of the energy demands of pregnancy assume that
decreases in activity during pregnancy compensate for the
increased costs of moving a heavier body. The energy costs of
pregnancy, therefore, are estimated from expected gains in body
weight, changes in maternal body composition, and increments in
basal metabolism. The most commonly used estimates of energy
needs are based on a gestational weight gain of 12.5 kg. This
weight gain represents increases in fat and protein of
approximately 3.8 kg and 0.9 kg, respectively, and a net increase
in basal metabolism through pregnancy equivalent to approximately
36000 kcal. Basal metabolism, therefore, accounts for 47% of the
energy cost, fat stores for a similar proportion, and gains in
protein for the remaining 6%.
Estimates of increments in basal metabolism during pregnancy, however, are variable and appear to be highly dependent upon maternal nutritional well-being. A recent multicountry study of the energy requirements of pregnancy (DURNIN, 1987) reported values for Scottish and Dutch women (approximately 30000 to 34000 kcal), similar to estimates published earlier by HYTTEN and LEITCH (1971) for Scottish women, but much lower values for Gambian women (approximately 2000 kcal; see Table 6). Increments in basal metabolism, however, rose to approximately 13000 kcal in the Gambian group following food supplementation.
The reduced costs of pregnancy in Gambian women were explained, in part, by rates of basal metabolism in early pregnancy below preconception values in both supplemented and unsupplemented groups (LAWRENCE et al., 1984). While reductions in basal metabolism may be seen as a potentially beneficial adjustment to the nutritional demands of pregnancy in a nutritionally stressed population, the physiologic costs may be substantial. Reductions in basal metabolism, associated with nutritional deprivation, carry significant functional costs, as documented exhaustively in the Minnesota semistarvation studies (KEYS et al., 1950).
Gains in maternal fat also appear to vary widely. In the multicountry study referred to previously, the highest and lowest fat gains were observed in Scottish and Gambian women, 25347 kcal and 6600 kcal, respectively. Initial body mass indices for these groups were moderate, 21.8 for the Scottish women and 20.6 for the Gambian group. The mean weight gain was 11.7 kg for the Scottish group and 7.7 kg for the Gambian group.
Table 6. Energy requirements of pregnancy data from the five-country study1
Scotland |
Netherlands |
Gambia |
Thailand |
Philippines |
|
n |
88 |
57 |
52 |
44 |
51 |
BMI (kg/m2)2 |
21.8 |
21.9 |
20.5 |
20.6 |
19.5 |
BMR (kcal/kg)2 |
23.4 (2.5) |
26.8 (2.5) |
23.0 (2.1) |
22.2 (2.1) |
20.9 (2.1) |
Total fat-free mass2 (%
body wt) |
73 |
72 |
80 |
76 |
75 |
Total wt gain (kg) |
11.7 (0.4) |
10.5 (0.5) |
7.3 (0.4) |
8.9 (0.4) |
8.5 (0.4) |
Gestational wt gain (%)3 |
< 50% |
< 50% |
< 15% |
< 50% |
» 15% |
BMR (kcal)4 |
30144 |
34450 |
1890 |
23923 |
18900 |
Total cost of pregnancy (kcal) |
67225 |
68421 |
18660 |
49760 |
43301 |
1 DURNIN, 1987.
2 At 10 wk post partum.
3 Based on Subcommittee on Nutritional Status and Weight Gain During Pregnancy and Subcommittee on Dietary Intake and Nutrient Supplements During Pregnancy. Nutrition During Pregnancy. Institute of Medicine. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, 1990.
4 Contribution of BMR to total cost of pregnancy.
Table 7. Estimated energy requirements (kcal/d) by trimester for pregnant white, non-Hispanic, American married women (BMI1 < 19.8) delivering live infants
|
Percentiles2 |
||||||||
15th |
50th |
85th |
|||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
(trimester) |
(trimester) |
(trimester) |
|||||||
A3 |
184 |
920 |
1656 |
296 |
1472 |
2664 |
388 |
3492 |
3496 |
B4 |
5985 |
13775 |
4750 |
9595 |
22040 |
7695 |
12440 |
29735 |
10355 |
C5 |
6215 |
10067 |
19442 |
6215 |
10067 |
19442 |
6215 |
10067 |
19442 |
Subtotals |
12384 |
24762 |
25848 |
16106 |
33579 |
29801 |
19043 |
43294 |
33293 |
Total |
62994 |
79486 |
95630 |
1 Body mass index (kg/m2).
2 Total weight gain percentile.
3 Assumes 4 kcal/g of protein gained.
4 Assumes 9.5 kcal/g of fat gained.
5 Assumes daily increment of 67 kcal, 108 kcal, and 208 kcal per day across all groups for trimesters 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Table 8. Estimated energy requirements (kcal/d) by trimester for pregnant white, non-Hispanic, American married women (BMI1 19.8-26.0) delivering live infants
|
Percentiles2 |
||||||||
15th |
50th |
85th |
|||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
(trimester) |
(trimester) |
(trimester) |
|||||||
A3 |
164 |
820 |
1476 |
296 |
1472 |
2664 |
396 |
1984 |
3564 |
B4 |
5320 |
12350 |
4275 |
9595 |
22040 |
7695 |
12920 |
29735 |
10355 |
C5 |
6215 |
10067 |
19442 |
6215 |
10067 |
19442 |
6215 |
10067 |
19442 |
Subtotals |
11699 |
23237 |
25193 |
16106 |
33579 |
29801 |
19531 |
41786 |
33361 |
Total |
60129 |
79486 |
94678 |
1 Body mass index (kg/m2).
2 Total weight gain percentile.
3 Assumes 4 kcal/g of protein gained.
4 Assumes 9.5 kcal/g of fat gained.
5 Assumes daily increment of 67 kcal, 108 kcal, and 208 kcal per day across all groups for trimesters 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
Table 9. Estimated energy requirements (kcal/d) by trimester for pregnant white, non-Hispanic, American married women (BMI1 26.1-29.0) delivering live infants
Percentiles2 |
|||||||||
15th |
50th |
85th |
|||||||
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|
(trimester) |
(trimester) |
(trimester) |
|||||||
A3 |
136 |
684 |
1228 |
264 |
1320 |
2376 |
368 |
1844 |
3312 |
B4 |
4465 |
10260 |
3610 |
8645 |
19855 |
6935 |
12065 |
27645 |
9690 |
C5 |
6215 |
10067 |
19442 |
6215 |
10067 |
19442 |
6215 |
10067 |
19442 |
Subtotals |
10816 |
21011 |
24280 |
15124 |
31242 |
28753 |
18648 |
39556 |
32444 |
Total |
56107 |
75119 |
90648 |
1 Body mass index (kg/m2).
2 Total weight gain percentile.
3 Assumes 4 kcal/g of protein gained.
4 Assumes 9.5 kcal/g of fat gained.
5 Assumes daily increment of 67 kcal, 108 kcal, and 208 kcal per day across all groups for trimesters 1, 2, and 3, respectively.
The Scottish group's gestational weight gain was below the 50th percentile value calculated by the IOM pregnancy report (Subcommittee on Nutritional Status and Weight Gain During Pregnancy and Subcommittee on Dietary Intake and Nutrient Supplements During Pregnancy, 1990) for women of moderate BMIs; the mean gestational weight gain for the Gambian women was below the 15th percentile. It is difficult, therefore, to interpret the public health significance of the range of energy costs of pregnancy (18682 to 67300 kcal) calculated by those studies, without additional measures of maternal and infant outcomes in a larger population sample.
Theoretical estimates of the energy costs of pregnancy, which are based on gestational weight gains associated with good pregnancy outcomes as defined by the IOM subcommittee (Subcommittee on Nutritional Status and Weight Gain During Pregnancy and Subcommittee on Dietary Intake and Nutrient Supplements During Pregnancy, 1990), are found in Tables 7-9. These estimates are based on the same assumptions regarding body composition which were used to derive estimates of protein needs and also assume a ratio of fat accumulation of 1:2.3:0.8 for each respective trimester of pregnancy. On that basis, theoretical estimates of energy needs range from 60100 to 95000 kcal. The lower estimate corresponds to women with moderate BMI who gained weight at the 15th percentile and the higher estimate to women with low BMI who gained weight at the 85th percentile, respectively.
Gestational
weight gains at the 50th percentile for women with low, moderate,
and high BMI ranged from 75000 to 79000 kcal. Basal metabolic
costs were estimated from measurements reported by HYTTEN and
LEITCH (1971) and were assumed to be similar across all groups.
The need for more detailed observations of body composition and
BMR in groups characterized by a relatively wide range of
prepregnancy BMI is made clear by the assumptions required for
these calculations.
The influence of diet and
physical activity on pregnancy was evaluated recently by a
subcommittee organized under the Food and Nutrition Board's
Committee on International Nutrition Programs (Subcommittee on
Diet, Physical Activity, and Pregnancy Outcome, 1989). Pregnant
women appear to decrease the intensity of work, i.e., the same
amount of work may be done as before pregnancy, but it is
accomplished over a longer period. The efficiency of work
performance does not appear to be improved in non-weight-bearing
activities during pregnancy, but there is conflicting evidence
regarding the efficiency of weight-bearing activities. There were
few studies available that include combined measurements of diet,
physical activity, and pregnancy outcomes, especially outcomes
that focused on maternal well-being.
Data from
human studies suggest that mild physical activity does not
adversely influence pregnancy outcomes in well-nourished
populations, but evidence from animal studies suggests that
severe, acute exercise and severe undernutrition decrease uterine
blood flow and may thereby compromise the fetus. There is also
suggestive epidemiological evidence that strenuous exercise and
prolonged mild exertion adversely affect gestational duration.
The paucity of data and the public health significance of
physical activity during pregnancy, however, point out a strong
need to evaluate the relationships among energy expenditure,
nutritional status, and pregnancy outcome among pregnant women
who perform moderate to severe physical work, especially among
groups at risk of malnutrition. No studies of pregnant women were
found which investigated protein-energy relationships at diverse
planes of physical activity.
Variations in weight gain
and basal metabolism significantly influence the energy needs of
pregnancy. Caution, however, is necessary when evaluating
reductions in basal metabolism which are reversed by food
supplementation. Significant functional costs to the mother may
be associated with diminished rates of basal metabolism. The
effects of pregnancy on the costs of physical activity have not
been studied well. Available data suggest that net costs are not
changed, and increased energy needs, expected on the basis of
greater body weight, are compensated for by a decreased intensity
of physical activity. No consistent data base is available
regarding efficiency of work performance during pregnancy.